Release peace: the magazine

Release peace: the magazine

Analysis & Background Stories on International Affairs

Can a Port Build Peace? Morocco’s $1.2 Billion Project

Article by: Isabelle Vagell

This article was written by a 2026 Rohatyn Global Fellow as part of a collaboration with the Rohatyn Center for Global Affairs at Middlebury College. 

Where the Sahara Meets the Atlantic

Forty kilometers north of Dakhla, where the Sahara meets the Atlantic, workers are constructing a $1.2 billion deepwater port. The isolated peninsula, flanked by the cold Canary Current and interrupted only by sparse acacia scrub, sits at the center of an ambitious Moroccan infrastructure initiative. The massive complex will span 1,650 hectares with a projected capacity of 35 million tons annually, surpassing Casablanca’s current port capacity. Yet this megaproject sits on disputed ground. Western Sahara has remained on the UN’s list of non-self-governing territories since 1963 and its contentious status persists. Since 1975, Morocco has controlled approximately 80 percent of the territory in opposition to the Polisario Front’s claims of independence for the Sahrawi people. Moroccan officials claim to be “constructing an ecosystem” and speak proudly of a new potential “Dubai of Africa.” Yet the port’s location raises a deeper and intellectually challenging question: Can building the material foundations of peace be a substitute for addressing its political roots?

An Economic Tool: Development as Administrative Consolidation

The Dakhla Atlantic port is a key part of Morocco’s 2030 National Port Strategy. The plan focuses on modernizing and expanding the country’s maritime infrastructure along both its Atlantic and Mediterranean coasts, with Dakhla as its most ambitious project. The port had already created 1,800 jobs by November 2025, with 20,000 estimated to be created within the broader port ecosystem after completion of the construction.

Beyond employment, the Dakhla-Oued Eddahab region is positioned for major renewable energy investment. Green hydrogen projects totaling approximately $35 billion in planned investment. This includes a $25 billion hydrogen-to-ammonia facility and multiple gigawatt-scale production plants, designed to function as an export hub for green fuels destined for the nearby European markets. The port’s proximity to Western Sahara’s phosphate deposits, representing an astonishing 72% of global reserves, positions it as a likely export channel for a resource that has long been a source of tension in the conflict around the disputed territory. The port project amounts to a massive effort of de facto integration. The physical infrastructure normalizes and institutionalizes Moroccan presence, turning contested territory into an operating economic fact.

A Political Tool: The Atlantic Initiative and Regional Leverage

Morocco’s ambitions for the port extend beyond Western Sahara’s borders. On November 6, 2023, the forty-eighth anniversary of the Green March, King Mohammed VI announced the Atlantic Initiative. The plan offers landlocked Sahel states (Mali, Niger, Burkina Faso, and Chad) access to the Atlantic via Moroccan road, rail, and port infrastructure, alongside large-scale development projects. The timing and the audience were deliberate. All four countries had experienced coups or unconstitutional transitions of power between 2020 and 2023. Three of them -Mali, Niger, and Burkina Faso- faced ECOWAS sanctions and eventually left the organization in January 2024 to form the Alliance of Sahel States. Niger’s experienced a cut of the foreign aid it received by 40 percent in 2023, as donors and creditors withheld support following the coup. The country, already one of the poorest in the world, was left with shrinking access to both finance and trade routes. Morocco strategically placed its initiative to offer an alternative.

Continental Integration

These Sahel states received the initiative well, and the strategic logic shown by Morocco extends beyond their recent political turmoil: Intra-African trade accounted for only about 15 percent of the continent’s total trade in 2023, compared to roughly 67 percent within Europe and 44 percent within the Americas. Trade costs as a result of poor road infrastructure in Africa run nearly 29 percent of the value of goods, compared to 7 percent for Africa’s extra-continental trade in 2024. The African Continental Free Trade Area envisions reducing these costs and deepening intra-regional connectivity across terrestrial and maritime routes. The port’s location and capacity make it a logical, if contested, candidate for that vision.

Building Interdependence

By routing Sahelian trade through Moroccan-built infrastructure, Morocco stands to create a web of regional interdependence with a vested economic interest in the port’s continued operation. Sahel states gain a lifeline outside ECOWAS and a route to global markets. Morocco, in turn, gains partners with a vested political interest in the port’s operation and its operation by Morocco. The result is that the African Union’s rhetoric of continental integration and Morocco’s territorial interests point, for now, in the same direction.

Shifting Ground: International Endorsements

The international legal picture has also shifted in Morocco’s favor. The United States recognized Moroccan sovereignty over Western Sahara in December 2020. The former colonial power France followed suit in July 2024. Nearly 40 percent of African Union member states had opened consulates in Laayoune, likewise in Western Sahara, or Dakhla by 2024. In October 2025, the UN Security Council adopted a resolution offering its strongest endorsement yet of Morocco’s 2007 autonomy proposal, a plan for broad self-governance under Moroccan sovereignty. The Polisario Front rejected the resolution, and the support of its main backer, Algeria, remains firm.

Infrastructure as a Mechanism of Peace?

The port creates real material foundations: jobs, trade routes, renewable energy investment, and regional partnerships that give outside states a stake in Western Sahara’s stability. Economic interdependence has the potential to outlast the political disputes that preceded it. Yet, a port does not hold a referendum. The Dakhla Atlantic port represents a striking case of infrastructure as statecraft, an attempt to address a political problem through economic facts on the ground. Whether that constitutes peace, or simply a more comfortable kind of unresolved conflict, is a question the concrete, cranes, and ships cannot answer.

 

If you would also like to write articles on insightful stories you care about, send us a brief email!